BBQ - Revision history

SNCAenjoyer671488: Geg

2026-04-07T21:35:18Z

Geg

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:35, 7 April 2026
Line 10:		Line 10:

	=== DNB Ban ===		=== DNB Ban ===
	The first action he took was on August 9, 2025 (literally one day after he came into power) was {{Keyedtext\|banning all real or AI-generated depictions of child abuse.}}<ref~~><nowiki~~>https://megalodon.jp/2025-0810-1244-22/https://www.soyjak.st:443/soy/thread/12574926.html~~</nowiki>~~</ref>		The first action he took was on August 9, 2025 (literally one day after he came into power) was {{Keyedtext\|banning all real or AI-generated depictions of child abuse.}}<ref>https://megalodon.jp/2025-0810-1244-22/https://www.soyjak.st:443/soy/thread/12574926.html</ref>

	=== August 26 {{Brimtext\|Loli defense}} ===		=== August 26 {{Brimtext\|Loli defense}} ===
	On August 26, 2025, a user who posted loli 'p was unbanned on /pol/, causing outrage in many 'teens, and BBQ had stated in the IRC that he {{Keyedtext\|wished for the user to remain banned}} (while other admins {{Brimtext\|wanted him unbanned}}),<ref~~><nowiki~~>https://archive.ph/drXcB~~</nowiki>~~</ref> but stated that he also believes real-life CSAM material is much worse than 'p. Sadly adding him to the ever-growing list of Quotist Administrators who have defended drawn 'p using either the [[sharty:Factoid\|"But CSAM is le worse, therefore Loli 'p is fine!"]] or the [[sharty:Branigger\|"It'S FiCtIOnAl, ChUd"]] excuse. The user was later banned again, but many 'teens remained upset at the administration unbanning him to begin with.<ref~~><nowiki~~>https://archive.ph/nU3Ca~~</nowiki>~~</ref>		On August 26, 2025, a user who posted loli 'p was unbanned on /pol/, causing outrage in many 'teens, and BBQ had stated in the IRC that he {{Keyedtext\|wished for the user to remain banned}} (while other admins {{Brimtext\|wanted him unbanned}}),<ref>https://archive.ph/drXcB</ref> but stated that he also believes real-life CSAM material is much worse than 'p. Sadly adding him to the ever-growing list of Quotist Administrators who have defended drawn 'p using either the [[sharty:Factoid\|"But CSAM is le worse, therefore Loli 'p is fine!"]] or the [[sharty:Branigger\|"It'S FiCtIOnAl, ChUd"]] excuse. The user was later banned again, but many 'teens remained upset at the administration unbanning him to begin with.<ref>https://archive.ph/nU3Ca</ref>

	== Facts about him{{Note\|According to facts and science}} ==		== Facts about him{{Note\|According to facts and science}} ==

SNCAenjoyer671488: /* History */ Removed the bit about Quote defending Loli 'p since that image is seemingly fake

2026-04-07T21:34:17Z

History: Removed the bit about Quote defending Loli 'p since that image is seemingly fake

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:34, 7 April 2026
Line 13:		Line 13:

	=== August 26 {{Brimtext\|Loli defense}} ===		=== August 26 {{Brimtext\|Loli defense}} ===
	On August 26, 2025, a user who posted loli 'p was unbanned on /pol/, causing outrage in many 'teens, and BBQ had stated in the IRC that he {{Keyedtext\|wished for the user to remain banned}} (while other admins {{Brimtext\|wanted him unbanned}}),<ref><nowiki>https://archive.ph/drXcB</nowiki></ref> but stated that he also believes real-life CSAM material is much worse than 'p. Sadly adding him to the ever-growing list of Quotist Administrators who have defended drawn 'p using either the [[sharty:Factoid\|"But CSAM is le worse, therefore Loli 'p is fine!"]] or the [[sharty:Branigger\|"It'S FiCtIOnAl, ChUd"]] excuse. ~~Mind you, Quote ximself has used the "fictional" excuse at this point.<ref>[[:File:Quotecux.png]]</ref>~~ The user was later banned again, but many 'teens remained upset at the administration unbanning him to begin with.<ref><nowiki>https://archive.ph/nU3Ca</nowiki></ref>		On August 26, 2025, a user who posted loli 'p was unbanned on /pol/, causing outrage in many 'teens, and BBQ had stated in the IRC that he {{Keyedtext\|wished for the user to remain banned}} (while other admins {{Brimtext\|wanted him unbanned}}),<ref><nowiki>https://archive.ph/drXcB</nowiki></ref> but stated that he also believes real-life CSAM material is much worse than 'p. Sadly adding him to the ever-growing list of Quotist Administrators who have defended drawn 'p using either the [[sharty:Factoid\|"But CSAM is le worse, therefore Loli 'p is fine!"]] or the [[sharty:Branigger\|"It'S FiCtIOnAl, ChUd"]] excuse. The user was later banned again, but many 'teens remained upset at the administration unbanning him to begin with.<ref><nowiki>https://archive.ph/nU3Ca</nowiki></ref>

	== Facts about him{{Note\|According to facts and science}} ==		== Facts about him{{Note\|According to facts and science}} ==

SNCAenjoyer671488: Added some nu sections, added a template for xim, and Snopes

2026-04-04T14:01:26Z

Added some nu sections, added a template for xim, and Snopes

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 {{NeedsImages}}
 {{Quotey}}
-BBQ was a janny for Soyjak Party for some time. He was heavily disliked due to being a massive quotist and implementing a lot of Quote’s changes specifically on [[:/pol/]] and [[:/sude/]]. As a result, he stepped down on March 25 of 2026.
+{{Infobox officeholder|name=BBQ Sauce|known_for=Former manager of the Sharty|image=[[File:BBQ's 'jak.png|200px]]|nationality=American|party=Independent|admin=[[Quote]]|predecessor=[[Mustard]]|wiki_account=[[sharty:User:BBQ|User:BBQ]]|tripcode=<span style="color: #754522">'''Chud ## Manager'''</span><br>
 [[Category:Jannies]]

Channel of the Sith at 19:53, 3 April 2026

2026-04-03T19:53:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:53, 3 April 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	BBQ was a janny for Soyjak Party for some time		{{Stub}}
			{{NeedsImages}}
			{{Quotey}}
			BBQ was a janny for Soyjak Party for some time. He was heavily disliked due to being a massive quotist and implementing a lot of Quote’s changes specifically on [[:/pol/]] and [[:/sude/]]. As a result, he stepped down on March 25 of 2026.

			[[Category:Jannies]]

SNCAenjoyer671488: I don't know, I just wanted to make the 900th article o algo

2026-04-03T19:43:35Z

I don't know, I just wanted to make the 900th article o algo

New page

BBQ was a janny for Soyjak Party for some time

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:35, 7 April 2026
Line 10:		Line 10:

	=== DNB Ban ===		=== DNB Ban ===
	The first action he took was on August 9, 2025 (literally one day after he came into power) was {{Keyedtext\|banning all real or AI-generated depictions of child abuse.}}<ref~~><nowiki~~>https://megalodon.jp/2025-0810-1244-22/https://www.soyjak.st:443/soy/thread/12574926.html~~</nowiki>~~</ref>		The first action he took was on August 9, 2025 (literally one day after he came into power) was {{Keyedtext\|banning all real or AI-generated depictions of child abuse.}}<ref>https://megalodon.jp/2025-0810-1244-22/https://www.soyjak.st:443/soy/thread/12574926.html</ref>

	=== August 26 {{Brimtext\|Loli defense}} ===		=== August 26 {{Brimtext\|Loli defense}} ===
	On August 26, 2025, a user who posted loli 'p was unbanned on /pol/, causing outrage in many 'teens, and BBQ had stated in the IRC that he {{Keyedtext\|wished for the user to remain banned}} (while other admins {{Brimtext\|wanted him unbanned}}),<ref~~><nowiki~~>https://archive.ph/drXcB~~</nowiki>~~</ref> but stated that he also believes real-life CSAM material is much worse than 'p. Sadly adding him to the ever-growing list of Quotist Administrators who have defended drawn 'p using either the [[sharty:Factoid\|"But CSAM is le worse, therefore Loli 'p is fine!"]] or the [[sharty:Branigger\|"It'S FiCtIOnAl, ChUd"]] excuse. The user was later banned again, but many 'teens remained upset at the administration unbanning him to begin with.<ref~~><nowiki~~>https://archive.ph/nU3Ca~~</nowiki>~~</ref>		On August 26, 2025, a user who posted loli 'p was unbanned on /pol/, causing outrage in many 'teens, and BBQ had stated in the IRC that he {{Keyedtext\|wished for the user to remain banned}} (while other admins {{Brimtext\|wanted him unbanned}}),<ref>https://archive.ph/drXcB</ref> but stated that he also believes real-life CSAM material is much worse than 'p. Sadly adding him to the ever-growing list of Quotist Administrators who have defended drawn 'p using either the [[sharty:Factoid\|"But CSAM is le worse, therefore Loli 'p is fine!"]] or the [[sharty:Branigger\|"It'S FiCtIOnAl, ChUd"]] excuse. The user was later banned again, but many 'teens remained upset at the administration unbanning him to begin with.<ref>https://archive.ph/nU3Ca</ref>

	== Facts about him{{Note\|According to facts and science}} ==		== Facts about him{{Note\|According to facts and science}} ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:34, 7 April 2026
Line 13:		Line 13:

	=== August 26 {{Brimtext\|Loli defense}} ===		=== August 26 {{Brimtext\|Loli defense}} ===
	On August 26, 2025, a user who posted loli 'p was unbanned on /pol/, causing outrage in many 'teens, and BBQ had stated in the IRC that he {{Keyedtext\|wished for the user to remain banned}} (while other admins {{Brimtext\|wanted him unbanned}}),<ref><nowiki>https://archive.ph/drXcB</nowiki></ref> but stated that he also believes real-life CSAM material is much worse than 'p. Sadly adding him to the ever-growing list of Quotist Administrators who have defended drawn 'p using either the [[sharty:Factoid\|"But CSAM is le worse, therefore Loli 'p is fine!"]] or the [[sharty:Branigger\|"It'S FiCtIOnAl, ChUd"]] excuse. ~~Mind you, Quote ximself has used the "fictional" excuse at this point.<ref>[[:File:Quotecux.png]]</ref>~~ The user was later banned again, but many 'teens remained upset at the administration unbanning him to begin with.<ref><nowiki>https://archive.ph/nU3Ca</nowiki></ref>		On August 26, 2025, a user who posted loli 'p was unbanned on /pol/, causing outrage in many 'teens, and BBQ had stated in the IRC that he {{Keyedtext\|wished for the user to remain banned}} (while other admins {{Brimtext\|wanted him unbanned}}),<ref><nowiki>https://archive.ph/drXcB</nowiki></ref> but stated that he also believes real-life CSAM material is much worse than 'p. Sadly adding him to the ever-growing list of Quotist Administrators who have defended drawn 'p using either the [[sharty:Factoid\|"But CSAM is le worse, therefore Loli 'p is fine!"]] or the [[sharty:Branigger\|"It'S FiCtIOnAl, ChUd"]] excuse. The user was later banned again, but many 'teens remained upset at the administration unbanning him to begin with.<ref><nowiki>https://archive.ph/nU3Ca</nowiki></ref>

	== Facts about him{{Note\|According to facts and science}} ==		== Facts about him{{Note\|According to facts and science}} ==