Talk:SNCApedia (detractor perspective)

Delte, youknow why

no, i dont know why, why?

coalfarmer is a leaky nigger who can't come up with a valid reason to delete this page 2A0D:BBC7:0:0:F816:3EFF:FE18:F410 00:23, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

>it's afraid

>delet dis cuz not needed!!!!!!

I'm sure as shit that "Article (alternative perspective)" is a trending joke (or sometimes truth nukes) in the big 'ki, so I don't see harm in having this article here. Why else it has thrembillions of Kuz articles in under different perspectives?
It's also related to this 'pedia after all, so why even delete it? It's not "too SNCA". Nothing is not too SNCA, not even mangoes. There's a reason why the Template:Delete exists, to DISCUSS why it should be deleted in the first place. ^{[Clarification needed] (talk)} 01:43, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

@Editor, I need reasons on why you even deleted it in the first place.

@Coalfarmer, For a guy that wanted the 'ki to be fun, surely you don't like fun in here as well so you need to explain as well.

I understand that you both have hate boners for how the big 'ki is (shittily) being administrated, but both of you don't have to clittyleak over an ounce of criticism towards the 'pedia. We're not perfect after all, but at least we're trying to be informative of what the big 'ki is censoring. ^{[Clarification needed] (talk)} 02:04, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

@Coalfarmer @Editor stop being so much of clitty leakers.

This page should stay. Yaquer200 (talk) 07:18, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

My clitty is free of leakage. Coalfarmer (talk) 07:32, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Specify if it's a joke then. ~ Editor // (talk) 11:10, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

isn't it obvious? Yaquer200 (talk) 11:12, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

No. Coalfarmer (talk) 11:24, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

>Retarded and unneeded, made by an underage leaky faggot. Sounds like a way to describe this entire site. Lol. 192.227.130.194 10:03, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

test

there's something wrong i'm not sure whether it's my browser settings or mediawiki in general. Like I can't edit any wiki that uses mediawiki 149.36.51.7 06:42, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Yeah no

This page is inherently hostile to SNCApedia and is full of bullshit that I could easily debunk. We get enough shit as is and there's no reason to have this unless you're making fun of people that genuinely think like this.

>Attentionwhoring namefags who constantly insert themself into every single page

• Bob and I cut down on this by getting rid of self insert templates. Also, this is the SNCApedia, not the Soyjak Wiki.

>Splintercucks who shill their 92642829th 0 posts-per-day Sharty splinter (and still gain no visitors).

• Boo fucking hoo.

>Cacas who call everything they don't like 'p and everyone they don't like as pedos

• >TIL babyjak porn is actually hecking wholesome and made by pedos who don't make it their whole personality

Retards who transheart giving attention to known pedophiles by making them seem like >TUFF AHHH PEDOS WITH TUFF AHHH MEGA ULTRA SUPREME NIGGERHELL SATANIST PEDO TEMPLATES (aka how the Jassy page had the {{Superpedo}} template kek what a way to give failtrolls what they want (attention))

• That template was deleted and repurposed to be a joke. Ironically, it was recreated by the biggest supporter of this page.

>Template spam

• We're cutting down on this. Don't act like the Soyjak Wiki doesn't have this problem.

>Groupthink

• >NOOOOOOO STOP CRITICIZING QUOTE YOU CAN'T DO THAT!!!!!

>being obsessed with Monkeybone, of all things

• Funnily enough, this was added by the person that forces monkeybone to begin with.

~ Editor // (talk) 11:20, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

>Bob and I cut down on this by getting rid of self insert templates. Also, this is the SNCApedia, not the Soyjak Wiki

you didn't cut down on it enough, see Coalfarmer_(Coalfarmer's_perspective). therefore not bullshit

>Boo fucking hoo

invalid argument. you know that it's true. therefore not bullshit

>>TIL babyjak porn is actually hecking wholesome and made by pedos who don't make it their whole personality

I never mentioned that

>That template was deleted and repurposed to be a joke. Ironically, it was recreated by the biggest supporter of this page.

What the page describes is an event that did happen, therefore not bullshit.

>We're cutting down on this. Don't act like the Soyjak Wiki doesn't have this problem.

the page describes an active problem, therefore not bullshit.

>>Groupthink

sharty:gigapng.png >NOOOOOOO STOP CRITICIZING QUOTE YOU CAN'T DO THAT!!!!!

>Funnily enough, this was added by the person that forces monkeybone to begin with.

yeah idk why he added that

--Detractoes (talk) 11:35, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

If it's a joke I'll allow it I guess. ~ Editor // (talk) 11:29, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Its a """joke""" according to the SLF who made it Coalfarmer (talk) 11:30, 31 March 2026 (UTC)