User talk:Landfill:SoyBlog: Difference between revisions
From SNCApedia, the shit nobody cares about encyclopedia
Latest comment: 00:16 by Editor in topic Nomination
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
https://www.sncapedia.org/wiki/Category:SNCA_Splinters | https://www.sncapedia.org/wiki/Category:SNCA_Splinters | ||
: None of these are autistic advertisements. They are documentation of sites that are long dead/are dead and were not written by the author, per rule 11. ~ [[User:Editor|Editor]] // ([[User talk:Editor|talk]]) 00:16, 18 March 2026 (UTC) | : None of these are autistic advertisements. They are documentation of sites that are long dead/are dead and were not written by the author, per rule 11. ~ [[User:Editor|Editor]] // ([[User talk:Editor|talk]]) 00:16, 18 March 2026 (UTC) | ||
::This is literally SNCApedia, people should be allowed to advertise their sites no matter how dead they are | |||
Revision as of 00:18, 18 March 2026
Nomination
Since Coalcaca isn't here to debate this, I will nominate this for deletion.
The SNCApedia, while for SNCA, doesn't accept literal ads. We are a wiki, not a landfill.
Coalfarmer made this obviously to advertise. It is dead and not very notable.
If you wish to contest this, please do so.
Otherwise, it will be deleted. ~ Editor // (talk) 00:07, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
>It is dead and not very notable. By this logic all of these pages should be deleted https://www.sncapedia.org/wiki/Category:SNCA_Splinters
- None of these are autistic advertisements. They are documentation of sites that are long dead/are dead and were not written by the author, per rule 11. ~ Editor // (talk) 00:16, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
- This is literally SNCApedia, people should be allowed to advertise their sites no matter how dead they are
