SNCApedia talk:Disruptive communities: Difference between revisions
From SNCApedia, the shit nobody cares about encyclopedia
Latest comment: Yesterday at 17:37 by SomebodyRum in topic should the QDL be concidered a hostile community?
SomebodyRum (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::this. | ::this. | ||
::- [[User:Aspartame|Aspartame]] ([[User talk:Aspartame|talk]]) 17:36, 15 April 2026 (UTC) | ::- [[User:Aspartame|Aspartame]] ([[User talk:Aspartame|talk]]) 17:36, 15 April 2026 (UTC) | ||
:they molest little dogs and jerk off to the loli 'p hard drive, so considering hostile would be a good idea [[User:SomebodyRum|SomebodyRum]] ([[User talk:SomebodyRum|talk]]) 17:37, 15 April 2026 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:37, 15 April 2026
should the QDL be concidered a hostile community?
they violate the 2nd and 3rd policies and i get you know the rest. (i am NOT saying that the sharty should be concidered hostile, only members of quotecord and those who support/defend the QDL)
- Aspartame (talk) 17:00, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
- People who wish to stay on quote owned sites are fine, though it should be obvious to avoid any trouble you should not use the same username you use on the 'ru, wiki or any board that allows namefagging, I think only the people who apply to that category would be the furtranny wiki editors, they have advocated for the total ban of this site on the inner soysphere and they have wanted to restrict our information, any nigger who behaves like that should be restricted or not allowed. Yaquer200 (talk) 17:07, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
- this.
- - Aspartame (talk) 17:36, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
- they molest little dogs and jerk off to the loli 'p hard drive, so considering hostile would be a good idea SomebodyRum (talk) 17:37, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
