Talk:Quote (Detractor's Perspective)

This is the talk page for discussing Quote (Detractor's Perspective) and anything related to its purposes and tasks.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

• New to SNCApedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; help.

• Assume good faith
• Be polite and avoid personal attacks
• Be welcoming to nusois
• Seek dispute resolution if needed

Article policies

• Neutral point of view
• No original research
• Verifiability

Wanna add a new topic? Click here! -> [+]

Welcome to the talk page

Discuss raisin here o algo SNCAenjoyer671488 (talk) 21:09, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

>let me add 67 thrembo templates and a cobnam to make this unreadable

atleast don't add the cobnam template

Pncalover (talk) 09:21, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Marge

Is there a higher quality version of this image? I can't quite make out the text in the second picture in it (the one of the Blobjak nigga getting banned, if that even matters) SNCAenjoyer671488 (talk) 00:26, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

nah I don't think there is. Bob (talk) 00:27, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

What about the pictures separated? Thougher (talk) 00:28, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

like the ones used in the 'toss? The blobson ban thing is on the Shiwi somewhere. Bob (talk) 00:55, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll look for that now o algo SNCAenjoyer671488 (talk) 13:25, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Would you mind linking it to me if possible? It's just that the Shiwi has over 3000 pages, it's a lot to look through SNCAenjoyer671488 (talk) 13:39, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Too bad SNCAenjoyer671488 (talk) 00:38, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Put that old IP address of Quote's through some lookup tool

Here's what I got

Possible 'ox?

Think this could be anything substantial? SNCAenjoyer671488 (talk) 23:40, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

does anyone have a archive of the thread which quote said loli is okay

the picture looks fake Yoot (talk) 23:16, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

How so?

I would like to see a 'chive if one exists thoughbeit SNCAenjoyer671488 (talk) 15:23, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

the date looks fake, it doesn't use relative time and when you turn off relative time from the options menu it shows it in month/day/year/hour format Yoot (talk) 18:29, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

You know what? Yeah, I see it now. It does look kinda fake SNCAenjoyer671488 (talk) 22:55, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

It probably is, if it's on the article best to remove it. Bob (talk) 00:14, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

We should link threads wherein Quote defends paedophilia/takes too long to ban a foodist/talks about keeping 'p on splinters instead of only providing images which can easily be fabricated.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymous327 (talk • contribs)

remaking the quote triggerpic

im gonna remake the quote triggerpic to clarify a few things i missed and/or fucked up on, if you have any quote fuckups let me know so i can add them.

- Aspartame (talk) 15:08, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

and im gonna clarify a few things also.

bernkastel isnt the only one being used for racebait, they use rika for the more "subtle" aspects of their fetish, such as the chudbaiting aspect.

while quote was likely not the one that approved the jailbait or the bocchi 'p, the mediators are still under quotist rule and are 100% being influenced by him or cumstard.

speaking of the bocchi 'p, i misinterpreted the character as being satania (who was also used in itoddler spam, hence the confusion).

i WILL fix these issues in my remake.

- Aspartame (talk) 15:24, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Saw the nu-trigger pic, pretty gemmy if I do say so myself. SNCAenjoyer671488 (talk) 22:06, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Involvement with incels.is and rdrama

Someone could add information regarding Quote's involvement with these sites if it is not outdated already (cf. https://swedishwin.com/raid/res/5107.html)

Why I renamed this page

To restore Gold-Quotist relations and this website's standing on the soypshere, I have split the topic of Quote into two; his detractors and supporters. I believe Quote being an outright paedophile is something that can be argued against, so this decision has been made. Like how does banning roblox make him a paedophile? Just because it prevented a raid? A janny being stupid and leaving content up does not correlate to Quote himself, that would make DOLL a paedophile too because of Red. SNCA Enthusiast (talk) 22:20, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

aw hell naw didyblod, bro is trying to fix relation with der 'stein

we didn't said quote was a pedophile because of the roblox ban (which was understandable due to failtroll and the community being annoying fuck), it just was just the side effect of banning it that caused less pedophile to be doxxed

while i personally acknowledge like a 6 hour difference in which he was possibly sleeping or busy, i just think the aftermath is what matter, his opinion on some things are just inherently pedophillic and not debatable (or harshly) SomebodyRum (talk) 22:29, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

>aw hell naw didyblod, bro is trying to fix relation with der 'stein

He doesn't even need to do this, the site has had good relations since August when Gold got the site and besides we have jannies form the big 'ki at points. Bob (talk) 22:34, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

yeah what about the babyjak porn incident SomebodyRum (talk) 22:37, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

what about it. Bob (talk) 22:42, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

I think these are valid concerns, the only problem is it might accelerate the underage hunkies on this wiki to complain da fuggen quotecord and push BS on there due to the addition of the detractor perspective, I am of the opinion detractor perspectives are not needed on this wiki, they are needed on the big 'ki but not on this site. I feel the addition of detractor persepectives will only decline it's page quality, also there are literally no actual Quote fans on this wiki, who will make and edit on Quote (supporter perspective) no one will because everyone dislikes him. Bob (talk) 22:32, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

tsmt, nobody on this site is going to cocksock quote unless they're on the 'ki looking to get a higher role, like quote doesn't like this site generally from what i can think, so if somebody make a positive page about him he won't care and there not even a incentive to make such page meatriding a zelligcuck SomebodyRum (talk) 22:36, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Not nessecarily his supporters, just non-detractors or something. SNCA Enthusiast (talk) 22:40, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

let me guess, the non detractor perspective would probably about quote history and identity outside of controversies? SomebodyRum (talk) 22:43, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

That would just be his Soyjak Wiki page but less censored by big 'ki jannies. Bob (talk) 22:44, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

i suppose but i'm not planning to write it at all cause i got other pages to fill up, not sure whos up to spending 20 minutes rewriting a more neutral tone SomebodyRum (talk) 22:46, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

The fuck does that mean. Bob (talk) 22:43, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Quote's page but without the controversies surrounding him, an article not worded in a way to point towards a conclusion he is responsible for such things directly. SNCA Enthusiast (talk) 22:49, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

well go ahead and write it because nobody is doing ts SomebodyRum (talk) 22:50, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

also now the text "Quote (Detractor's Perspective) is the coal that is killing the Party!" just make it sound that criticism is what killing the site geg SomebodyRum (talk) 22:33, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

>Quote is actively hostile to most splinters. >Multiple people within the Soysphere have actively tried to colonise and make this wiki "less hostile". What are you trying to accomplish here? Either you've had backchannel discussions with Quote or you're genuflecting because you're afraid of what Quote might do. Either way, trying to be cordial with someone who views you as a competitor is counterproductive, he would not extend the same olive branch to you.